E-numbers / E122 Colour

Carmoisine

also: Azorubine · Food Red 3 · Acid Red 14 · CI 14720
syntheticVegan ✓Vegetarian ✓Halal - checkKosher - check
Aaron Keen
Researched and written by Aaron Keen, Founder·Last reviewed 20 June 2026
The short version

A synthetic red food dye used to colour sweets, jellies and drinks. One of the six artificial colours linked to hyperactivity in children, requiring a mandatory warning label by UK and EU law.

Why it's worth knowing

Products containing E122 must by law carry the label warning 'may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children'. People who take aspirin or are salicylate-sensitive may be at higher risk of intolerance reactions such as hives, though no well-documented cases of such reactions to carmoisine specifically from food have been recorded in the EFSA literature.

What is it?

Carmoisine, also called Azorubine, is a synthetic azo dye produced from petroleum-derived starting materials. Azo dyes are built around a nitrogen-nitrogen double bond. It produces a deep red to burgundy colour and is highly water-soluble.

What does it do?

It absorbs light in the blue-green range of the visible spectrum, giving food a vivid crimson-red appearance. It is chemically stable under heat and acid conditions, making it useful in products that undergo cooking or fermentation.

Where you will see it

Jelly, blancmange, marzipan, Swiss roll, packet cheesecake mixes, brown sauce, jams and preserves, flavoured yogurts, packet soups, sweets and some soft drinks. On a UK label it appears as 'Carmoisine', 'Azorubine', or 'E122'.

What the science says

Hyperactivity in children

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial funded by the UK Food Standards Agency found that two mixtures each containing E122 and five other artificial colours, combined with the preservative sodium benzoate, were associated with increased hyperactivity scores in 3-year-old and 8- to 9-year-old children from the general population. E122 appeared in both Mixture A and Mixture B. Effects were not consistent across both age groups and both mixtures, and the study tested colour mixtures rather than individual colours, so no effect can be attributed to E122 alone. EFSA reviewed the study in 2008 and concluded the evidence was limited and not sufficient to revise acceptable daily intake levels, but could not rule out a small effect in some children.

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 153 three-year-olds and 144 eight-to-nine-year-olds found that two mixtures of artificial colours (including E122 in both mixtures) plus sodium benzoate were associated with increased hyperactivity scores compared with placebo. Effects were inconsistent across age groups and mixtures.

McCann D et al., The Lancet, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61306-32007RCT

EFSA's AFC Panel concluded the Southampton study provided limited evidence of a small effect on activity and attention in some children, but inconsistencies across age groups and mixtures meant the ADIs for the colours could not be revised. No biological mechanism was identified.

EFSA Journal, Assessment of the results of the study by McCann et al. (2007), doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2008.6602008regulatory review

The mandatory EU and UK warning label 'may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children' applies to all food and drink containing E122, under Annex V of assimilated Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008, in force from July 2010.

EU Regulation 1333/2008 Annex V; UK FSA approved-additives list2010regulatory

Intolerance reactions and aspirin sensitivity

As an azo dye, E122 is associated in the scientific literature with a potential for intolerance reactions in people who are sensitive to aspirin or salicylates. These would be pseudo-allergic reactions rather than true IgE-mediated allergies. However, a 2010 EFSA scientific opinion specifically noted that no data on sensitivity to carmoisine and no well-documented cases of intolerance reactions after oral exposure to carmoisine had been reported in the literature. The panel concluded that azo colours including E122 were unlikely to trigger severe adverse reactions at current levels of use. The theoretical risk from azo dye class-effects is noted in the literature, but is not specifically evidenced for E122 in food consumption settings.

A 2010 EFSA scientific opinion on food azo colours concluded that no data on sensitivity to carmoisine (E122) are available and no well-documented cases of intolerance reactions after oral exposure have been reported, though the panel acknowledged this could partly reflect underreporting.

EFSA Scientific Opinion on the appropriateness of food azo-colours including E 122 for inclusion in Annex IIIa of Directive 2000/13/EC, EFSA Journal, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.17782010regulatory review

EFSA's 2009 re-evaluation noted that azo dyes as a class are associated with pseudo-allergic reactions in aspirin-intolerant individuals, but did not identify specific documented cases for carmoisine in food use.

EFSA Scientific Opinion on re-evaluation of Azorubine/Carmoisine (E 122), EFSA Journal, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.13322009regulatory review

Animal studies: organ effects at high doses

Studies in rats and mice have found that carmoisine at high doses caused elevated liver and kidney function markers and signs of organ damage. A 2019 mouse study administering carmoisine at 200 and 400 mg/kg body weight per day over 120 days found liver and kidney damage, altered blood counts, and gene expression changes consistent with suppressed cell death in liver tissue; the ADI-equivalent dose (4 mg/kg) produced no such effects. The EFSA 2009 re-evaluation found no evidence of genotoxicity or carcinogenicity in standard animal studies, and the ADI of 4 mg/kg body weight per day was maintained. These findings are from animal models at doses far above realistic dietary exposure and their direct relevance to human food intake is uncertain.

Oral administration of carmoisine to young male rats over 30 days increased liver enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP) and kidney markers (urea, creatinine) and reduced antioxidant capacity, with more pronounced effects at higher doses.

Amin KA, Abdel Hameid H, Abd Elsttar AH, Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 48(10), pp. 2994-2999, doi:10.1016/j.fct.2010.07.0312010animal

Mice given carmoisine at 200 or 400 mg/kg body weight per day for 120 days showed significant liver and kidney damage, anaemia, and upregulation of apoptosis-blocking genes (Bcl-x, PARP) with downregulation of tumour-suppressor p53 in liver tissue. The low-dose group (4 mg/kg, equivalent to the ADI) showed no adverse effects.

Reza et al., Food Science and Nutrition, PMC6392843, doi:10.1002/fsn3.9062019animal

EFSA's 2009 re-evaluation found all genotoxicity tests for carmoisine were negative, no structural alert was present, and carcinogenicity studies in rats and mice showed no increase in tumour incidence. The ADI of 4 mg/kg body weight per day was not revised.

EFSA Scientific Opinion on re-evaluation of Azorubine/Carmoisine (E 122), EFSA Journal, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.13322009regulatory review

In vitro tests on human peripheral lymphocytes found that carmoisine induced chromosome aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges and increased DNA tail length (comet assay) at the highest tested concentration (300 micrograms per mL), but not at lower concentrations. The researchers called for further in vivo studies.

Toxicology Research, Oxford Academic, doi:10.1093/toxres/tfaf0332025lab

Children's exposure relative to the ADI

EFSA's 2009 assessment found that high-percentile exposure estimates for children aged 1 to 10 could exceed the acceptable daily intake of 4mg per kg body weight per day when using maximum permitted levels. A refined 2015 assessment using actual industry usage data found the ADI was not exceeded on average, though theoretical worst-case maximum permitted level scenarios still produced exceedances for toddlers and children at the high end of consumption.

EFSA's 2009 re-evaluation found that at the 95th percentile of exposure, using either maximum permitted levels or reported industry use levels, intake estimates for 1- to 10-year-old children could be above the ADI of 4mg/kg body weight per day.

EFSA Scientific Opinion on re-evaluation of Azorubine/Carmoisine (E 122), EFSA Journal, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.13322009regulatory review

A refined 2015 EFSA exposure assessment using actual industry use data and EU food consumption data found the ADI was not exceeded for any population group at mean or high exposure levels. However, under maximum permitted level scenarios, exposure estimates still exceeded the ADI for toddlers and children at the high level.

EFSA, Refined exposure assessment for Azorubine/Carmoisine (E 122), EFSA Journal, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.40722015regulatory review

Where it stands with the regulators

Status
Approved for use in the UK and EU
Legal basis
UK FSA approved-additives list (data.food.gov.uk/regulated-products/food_authorisations/e-122) and assimilated EU Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 (Annex II). Mandatory warning label required under Annex V of the same regulation.
Permitted foods
Jelly; Blancmange; Marzipan; Brown sauce and similar condiments; Jams and preserves; Flavoured yogurts; Packet soups; Sweets and confectionery; Cheesecake mixes; Breadcrumbs; Soft drinks (with conditions)
Maximum levels
50 mg/kg or 50 mg/l combined with E110, E124 and E155 in non-alcoholic flavoured drinks, edible ices, desserts, fine bakery wares and confectionery; 100 mg/kg in jams, jellies and marmalades; 100 mg/l in certain aromatised wine-based drinks (Americano, bitter vino). Source: UK Colours in Food Regulations 1995 Schedules 3 and 5.
Safe-intake limit (ADI)
0-4 mg/kg body weight per day (established JECFA 1983, SCF 1984, confirmed EFSA 2009)
History
The FSA commissioned the University of Southampton study (2007) which showed colour mixtures including E122 were associated with increased hyperactivity in children. In 2008, the FSA recommended voluntary withdrawal of these six colours from food, and many UK manufacturers reformulated. From July 2010, EU Regulation 1333/2008 Annex V made the children's warning label mandatory across the EU and in the UK. EFSA conducted a full re-evaluation in 2009 confirming the ADI and finding no genotoxic or carcinogenic signal. A refined exposure assessment in 2015 found real-world intake was below the ADI on average. E122 was never authorised for food use in the USA (delisted in 1963 from cosmetics only). It is not on the current Health Canada List of Permitted Food Colours and is not a designated food additive in Japan, where only positively listed additives may be used.

Who should be careful

Children: products containing E122 must carry the legal warning 'may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children'. Parents wanting to limit exposure should check ingredient lists for 'Carmoisine', 'Azorubine' or 'E122'. People with aspirin intolerance or salicylate sensitivity may wish to avoid azo dyes as a class, though EFSA found no well-documented cases of intolerance reactions to carmoisine in food specifically.

The honest read

Cutting through the noise

The hyperactivity link has been contested since it appeared. The Southampton study tested colour mixtures, not individual dyes, so no finding can be cleanly attached to E122 alone. EFSA twice reviewed the evidence and did not revise the acceptable daily intake. The mandatory warning label exists not because causation is proven for carmoisine individually, but because the FSA concluded the evidence created enough uncertainty that consumers deserved to know. Most major UK food manufacturers voluntarily removed these colours after 2008; the additive is still found in some imported confectionery and a handful of UK products. On intolerance reactions, EFSA's 2010 azo-colour opinion noted no well-documented cases for carmoisine after oral exposure, making the allergy risk less established than for some other azo dyes. Animal studies showing liver and kidney changes used doses well above realistic dietary exposure, and EFSA found no genotoxic or carcinogenic signal. The science on behavioural effects in children remains genuinely unsettled.

Related additives

Common questions

Is E122 banned in the UK?

No. E122 is an approved food additive in the UK under the assimilated EU Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. However, it must carry a mandatory warning label stating 'may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children'. E122 was never authorised for food use in the USA. It is also not on the Health Canada List of Permitted Food Colours and is not a designated food additive in Japan.

Is E122 one of the Southampton Six?

Yes. Carmoisine (E122) is one of the six artificial food colours tested in the 2007 University of Southampton study funded by the FSA. The other five are Tartrazine (E102), Quinoline Yellow (E104), Sunset Yellow (E110), Ponceau 4R (E124), and Allura Red (E129). All six require the children's warning label under UK and EU law. E122 appeared in both Mixture A and Mixture B of the study.

What foods contain E122?

E122 is found in jelly, blancmange, marzipan, Swiss roll, brown sauce, jams, flavoured yogurts, packet soups, sweets and some soft drinks. It appears on labels as 'Carmoisine', 'Azorubine', or 'E122'. Many UK brands voluntarily removed it after 2008; it is more commonly found in some imported products.

Is E122 vegan?

Yes. Carmoisine is entirely synthetic, derived from petroleum starting materials. It contains no animal, plant or microbial components and is considered vegan.

Sources

Aaron Keen

Aaron Keen is the founder of NutraSafe. He researches and writes every additive entry himself, from the primary sources. About the research →

This is a guide, not medical advice. If an additive affects you, speak to your GP or a dietitian.

See this on every food you scan

NutraSafe reads the label and puts every additive into plain English, with the source, right in the app.

Get NutraSafe on the App Store
NutraSafe Pro · £3.99/month · iOS