Traces of compounds that cause cancer
Charring plant material always produces some PAHs, and how much varies widely between makers and batches. Benzo[a]pyrene, the PAH used as a marker in the rules, is classed by IARC as causing cancer in humans. In 2026 European reviewers found some commercial E153 samples above the tighter limits being proposed, and recommended a lower benzo[a]pyrene limit plus a new limit for a group of four PAHs.
Benzo[a]pyrene, which can be an impurity in vegetable carbon, is classed as causing cancer in humans (Group 1) by IARC, based on extensive animal data and evidence that it damages DNA.
2010EstablishedIARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 92 (Benzo[a]pyrene)
They set no numerical daily limit because the toxicity data were too limited.
2012Regulator reviewEFSA ANS Panel, Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of vegetable carbon (E 153) as a food additive, EFSA Journal 10(3):2592
Reviewing commercial sample data from industry, reviewers found some samples above the highest proposed benzo[a]pyrene limit and four above the highest proposed limit for four PAHs, and recommended a lower benzo[a]pyrene limit and a new four-PAH limit.
2026Regulator reviewEFSA ANS Panel, Scientific opinion on the amendment of the specifications for vegetable carbon (E 153) as a food additive, EFSA Journal 24(1):e9855
The lab methods currently used to measure PAHs in activated and vegetable carbon were found not fit for purpose, which adds uncertainty about how accurately contamination in food-grade E153 is measured.
2022Lab studyCurrent analytical methods to quantify PAHs in activated carbon and vegetable carbon (E153) are not fit for purpose, Environmental Pollution
Nano-sized particles
European reviewers confirmed in 2012 that E153 contains some very small particles, including nano-sized ones under 100 nanometres, and that the data on them were not enough to judge their safety. They looked again in 2026, but the particle-size data industry supplied had flaws in method, so the question is still open.
Reviewers confirmed nanoparticles are present in vegetable carbon and recommended adding nano-scale considerations to the risk assessment. The data did not allow the material to be fully described.
2012Regulator reviewEFSA ANS Panel, Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of vegetable carbon (E 153), EFSA Journal 10(3):2592
The microscope data submitted to describe particle size had flaws in sample preparation and imaging, so a valid nanoparticle assessment was not possible, and the data did not support changing the particle-size rules.
2026Regulator reviewEFSA ANS Panel, Scientific opinion on the amendment of the specifications for vegetable carbon (E 153), EFSA Journal 24(1):e9855
Heavy metals
Because it is made from plants heated to high temperatures, vegetable carbon can hold traces of arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury. The 2026 review recommended lowering the limits for these and adding a limit for aluminium.
Reviewers recommended lowering the EU limits for arsenic, cadmium, mercury and lead in E153 and adding an aluminium limit. At the current arsenic limit, margins of exposure were below safety thresholds.
2026Regulator reviewEFSA ANS Panel, Scientific opinion on the amendment of the specifications for vegetable carbon (E 153), EFSA Journal 24(1):e9855