also: Iron hydroxides · CI Pigment Brown 6 · Iron oxide colours
Mineral pigments giving food yellow, red, brown, or black colours. Used on confectionery coatings, processed meats, cheese rinds, and many black olives.
Scan a barcode to check a food for iron oxides. NutraSafe Pro · £6.99/month · iPhone and Android
Sugar, Corn Starch, Hydrogenated Palm Kernel Oil, Thickeners: E1442, E414, E415, Dextrin, Glazing Agents: E904, E903, Flavouring, Emulsifier: E322, Colours: E160a, E172, E120, E133, E100
Red and black iron oxides tested positive in laboratory genotoxicity assays on mammalian cells.
Why it’s worth knowing. Red and black iron oxides tested positive in laboratory genotoxicity assays on mammalian cells. Regulators have not been able to rule this out because no gut site-of-contact data exist. Carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity studies were unavailable when EFSA last reviewed this additive; a new assessment is ongoing.
Iron oxides and hydroxides are inorganic mineral pigments derived from iron. Three forms are used in food: yellow (goethite, FeO(OH)), red (haematite, Fe2O3), and black (magnetite, FeO.Fe2O3). Mixtures produce brown and intermediate shades. Commercially they are synthesised from iron powder and purified to food-grade specifications rather than being taken directly from mined ore.
Provides colour by absorbing specific wavelengths of visible light. The pigments are added to surfaces or coatings of foods and to the bodies of confectionery, capsules, and processed products. They do not contribute flavour. Because the particles are poorly soluble, they largely pass through the gut without dissolving, which also means they do not deliver meaningful amounts of dietary iron.
Confectionery coatings and sugar shells; cake decorations and icings; the rinds and surfaces of processed cheeses; meat pies, sausage casings, and processed meat products; commercially prepared black olives (typically picked green then recoloured); smoked salmon and prawns (surface reddening); pharmaceutical and supplement capsules. On UK labels it appears as 'E172', 'iron oxides', or 'iron hydroxides'.
In laboratory tests on mammalian cells, both red iron oxide (Fe2O3) and black iron oxide (FeO.Fe2O3) produced signs of DNA damage, and this was seen for both nano-sized and micro-sized particles. The in vitro signal alone does not prove harm in people, but EFSA noted it could not be dismissed because no data from the site where exposure actually happens, the gut wall, were available. In vivo oral dosing studies in rats did not find genotoxic effects in blood cells, but EFSA said those tests did not cover the gastrointestinal lining, which is the relevant target.
Red (Fe2O3) and black (FeO.Fe2O3) iron oxide, both in nano and micro form, were positive in in vitro genotoxicity assays in mammalian cells; in vivo oral studies did not elicit genotoxic effects in rat blood cells, but no data for the gastrointestinal site-of-contact were available.
EFSA concluded that 'an adequate assessment of the safety of E 172 could not be carried out because a sufficient biological and toxicological database was not available', and recommended that additional toxicological data be provided.
When EFSA conducted its 2015 re-evaluation, studies covering long-term cancer risk and effects on reproduction or fetal development either did not exist or were submitted as unpublished company data that the Panel could not independently evaluate. This left two major safety questions formally unanswered. A follow-up EU data call was issued in 2016 and a new risk assessment (EFSA-Q-2021-00178) is ongoing as of 2025.
Carcinogenicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity data were not available and could not be evaluated by the EFSA Panel during the 2015 re-evaluation.
The European Commission issued a call for scientific and technical data on E172 in December 2016 to address the identified data gaps; a follow-up risk assessment (EFSA-Q-2021-00178) is listed as an ongoing risk assessment.
Studies measuring real commercial E172 pigments found that nano-sized particles, those below 100 nanometres, were present in most samples tested. Particle size was not included in food-grade specifications at the time of the 2015 opinion, so manufacturers were not required to control or declare this fraction. Iron oxide nanoparticles have been shown to reach the intestinal wall in particle form after passing through artificial digestion. Cell studies showed minimal uptake across the intestinal barrier and no cytotoxicity at low concentrations, but liver cell studies at higher concentrations showed signs of stress. EFSA flagged the absence of particle-size specifications as a gap.
Nanoparticles were detected in all five commercial E172 pigments examined by transmission electron microscopy or small-angle X-ray scattering; four of five had a size median below 100 nm.
Iron oxide E172 particles passed through artificial gastrointestinal digestion without dissolving and reached intestinal Caco-2 cells in particle form; minor uptake into cells was detected but almost no transport across the barrier.
EFSA recommended that particle size and particle size distribution should be included in the specifications for E172 and that grouping of different E172 forms for risk assessment purposes is not advisable due to variation in physicochemical properties.
Rat studies using food-grade iron(III) oxide nanoparticles at high doses found changes in the gut microbiota, with increases in bacteria associated with inflammation and obesity and reductions in beneficial Bifidobacterium. These effects appeared at doses substantially higher than typical dietary exposure from food colouring use. Extrapolating animal high-dose findings directly to human consumers at normal intake levels is not straightforward, and no human studies have been conducted.
High-dose iron(III) oxide nanoparticle exposure in rats (200 mg/kg body weight over 28 days) changed the abundance and composition of gut bacteria, increasing inflammation-associated species and reducing Bifidobacterium; lower doses showed minimal effects on microbial diversity.
Iron oxide pigments can carry trace impurities of lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury from their production process. EU specifications set maximum limits for these contaminants in food-grade E172, and regulators have called for revision of those limits. The concern is about the impurities in the pigment, not the iron oxide itself.
Purity concerns for E172 include possible contamination with heavy metals including lead and arsenic; regulatory reviews have called for stricter impurity limits and revision of current EU specification maximum levels for cadmium, arsenic, lead, and mercury.
People with hereditary haemochromatosis or other iron overload conditions should note that E172 contributes very little absorbable iron, but should discuss total iron intake from all sources with their doctor. Anyone wishing to reduce exposure to additives with outstanding safety questions can check ingredient lists for 'E172', 'iron oxides', or 'iron hydroxides', most commonly found on confectionery coatings, processed meat products, and commercially packaged black olives.
E172 sits in an unusual position: it has been used for decades in food and pharmaceuticals, yet the 2015 EFSA re-evaluation formally concluded it could not confirm whether it was adequately safe, because the toxicological database was incomplete. Red and black iron oxide produced DNA-damage signals in mammalian cell tests, and neither carcinogenicity nor reproductive toxicity data were available for independent review. The additive is poorly absorbed in the gut, which regulators treat as a mitigating factor, but nano-sized particles present in commercial pigments reach the intestinal wall intact, and what happens there in long-term use at site-of-contact is unknown. A new EFSA assessment is in progress. The honest picture is that the science is unresolved, not settled.
No. E172 is approved for use in the UK under the assimilated EU Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008 and is listed on the UK FSA's approved additives register. It remains permitted despite EFSA's 2015 conclusion that a full safety assessment could not be completed, because no specific harm was demonstrated that would trigger a ban.
In its 2015 re-evaluation EFSA found that red and black iron oxides produced positive results in laboratory genotoxicity tests on mammalian cells, but no data were available from the gut wall, the relevant point of contact. Carcinogenicity studies and reproductive toxicity studies were also missing. This left three key safety questions unanswered. A new assessment is ongoing.
E172 is most commonly found in confectionery with coloured sugar coatings or chocolate shells, cake decorations, meat pies, sausage casings, processed cheese rinds, and commercially packaged black olives (many black olives are picked green and recoloured with iron oxides). It also colours pharmaceutical and supplement capsules. On the label it appears as 'E172', 'iron oxides', or 'iron hydroxides'.
Yes. Iron oxides are mineral compounds with no animal-derived ingredients. E172 is suitable for vegans, vegetarians, and is considered acceptable under halal and kosher dietary rules.
Last reviewed: 20 June 2026
It's the only app that does thisUKJaneK
You Need This AppGmac2005
Best AppGK getting skinny UK App Store reviews
NutraSafe reads the label and puts every additive into plain English, with the source, right in the app.
NutraSafe Pro · £6.99/month · iPhone and Android
