Contaminants that damage DNA: glycidyl esters
Glycidyl esters form when plant oils and fats are refined at high heat, and they can be in the fats used to make PGPR. In the body they turn into glycidol, which damages DNA and is classed by IARC as probably causing cancer. In 2022 European reviewers found glycidyl esters in commercial PGPR samples and called for a limit of 1mg per kg.
Commercial PGPR samples tested in 2022 contained glycidyl esters. Reviewers recommended a limit of 1mg per kg and said the current EU impurity limits were not enough.
2022Regulator reviewEFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources (ANS), EFSA Journal
Glycidol, which glycidyl esters turn into, damages DNA and is classed as probably causing cancer in humans (Group 2A).
2000Regulator reviewIARC Monographs, Volume 77
A contaminant that harms kidneys: 3-MCPD
3-MCPD is another contaminant from refining fats and oils. European reviewers found it in commercial PGPR samples in 2022. In animal studies it damages the kidneys, and IARC classes it as possibly causing cancer. Reviewers recommended a limit of 2.5mg per kg for 3-MCPD and related compounds in PGPR.
3-MCPD and related compounds were found in commercial PGPR samples. Reviewers recommended a limit of 2.5mg per kg.
2022Regulator reviewEFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources (ANS), EFSA Journal
3-MCPD is classed as possibly causing cancer in humans (Group 2B), with the main animal evidence being kidney damage.
2013Animal studyIARC Monographs, Volume 101
The daily limit
The first daily limit, set in 1978, was 7.5mg per kg of body weight. In 2017 European reviewers raised it to 25mg per kg, based on more data including a two-year rat study.
Reviewers raised the daily limit from 7.5 to 25mg per kg of body weight in 2017.
2017Regulator reviewEFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources (ANS), EFSA Journal
Arsenic limits were too loose
The 2022 review also found that, at the arsenic limit then allowed in PGPR, the safety margin for arsenic was too small, especially if its use were extended to ice cream. Reviewers recommended bringing the legal arsenic limit down to match what was measured in commercial samples.
Reviewers found the safety margin for arsenic too small at the lower end if the existing EU limit were reached, and recommended lower maximum levels based on measured data.
2022Regulator reviewEFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources (ANS), EFSA Journal