⚠️ Safety Verdict: Use Caution (Inadequate Testing)
E950 (Acesulfame K) is approved but controversial. Critics argue it was approved based on limited, industry-funded studies from the 1970s-80s. No major independent long-term human studies. Some animal studies suggest cancer risk. Use in moderation or avoid.
🚨 Limited Safety Testing Concerns
Unlike aspartame (100+ studies), Acesulfame K was approved based on relatively few studies:
- Most safety studies from the 1970s-80s – outdated by modern standards
- Many studies industry-funded – potential bias
- Few long-term human studies
- Some animal studies showed thyroid disruption and possible tumours
Consumer advocacy groups (like CSPI) have called for more rigorous safety testing.
What is E950 (Acesulfame K)?
E950 is Acesulfame Potassium (also called Ace-K), a synthetic zero-calorie sweetener discovered in 1967.
Sweetness:
- 200 times sweeter than sugar
- Slightly bitter aftertaste at high concentrations
- Often blended with aspartame or sucralose to mask aftertaste
Why it's used:
- Zero calories
- Heat stable – survives baking and pasteurization
- Long shelf life – doesn't break down over time
- Synergistic with other sweeteners – enhances sweetness when combined
- Cheap to produce
Where is Acesulfame K Found?
Diet Drinks (Very Common):
- Diet soft drinks (Coke Zero, Pepsi Max, etc.)
- Energy drinks (sugar-free versions)
- Flavoured water
- Protein shakes
Low-Calorie Foods:
- Sugar-free gum and mints
- Low-calorie yogurts
- Ice cream (low-calorie versions)
- Jams and preserves
- Diabetic foods
Baked Goods:
- Protein bars
- Low-sugar cakes and biscuits
Table-top Sweeteners:
- Hermesetas (contains Ace-K + saccharin)
- Some "Splenda" blends
Non-Food Uses:
- Toothpaste and mouthwash
- Chewable vitamins
- Liquid medications
Health Concerns
1. Inadequate Safety Testing
Main criticism from consumer groups:
- FDA approval based on fewer than 10 studies (compared to 100+ for aspartame)
- Most studies conducted 40+ years ago
- Studies were short-term (90 days or less in some cases)
- No comprehensive long-term human studies
- Industry-funded research – potential conflict of interest
2. Possible Cancer Risk (Animal Studies)
Some animal studies raised concerns:
- Studies in 1970s-80s showed possible tumours in rats at high doses
- Lung and breast tumours in some studies
- Evidence weak and inconsistent – not replicated in all studies
- No human cancer studies conducted
Regulatory verdict: Agencies concluded evidence insufficient to ban, but critics argue more research needed.
3. Thyroid Disruption
- Some animal studies showed thyroid gland effects
- Possible hormonal disruption
- Concern for people with thyroid conditions
4. Gut Bacteria & Metabolic Effects
Emerging research (applies to most artificial sweeteners):
- May alter gut microbiome composition
- Could affect glucose tolerance and insulin response
- Possible link to weight gain despite zero calories
5. Potassium Content
Acesulfame contains potassium:
- Generally not a concern for healthy people
- People with kidney disease should monitor potassium intake
- Those on potassium-restricted diets should be aware
Why Critics Are Concerned
Organizations like the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) have called for more testing because:
- Approval rushed in 1988 based on limited data
- Studies not published in peer-reviewed journals – only submitted to FDA
- Modern toxicology standards higher than 1970s-80s
- Widespread use in children's products without long-term safety data
Regulatory Status
UK/EU: Approved with ADI of 9mg per kg body weight
US: FDA approved in 1988 (drinks), 2003 (general use)
Worldwide: Approved in 90+ countries
Acesulfame K vs Other Sweeteners
| Sweetener |
Safety Testing |
Concerns |
| Acesulfame K (E950) |
Limited, mostly 1970s-80s |
Inadequate testing, possible cancer/thyroid |
| Aspartame (E951) |
Extensive, 100+ studies |
PKU warning, gut bacteria |
| Sucralose (E955) |
Moderate, 1990s-2000s |
Gut bacteria, possible DNA damage |
| Stevia (E960) |
Good, recent studies |
Few concerns, natural origin |
Who Should Avoid Acesulfame K?
❌ Consider Avoiding:
- Pregnant and breastfeeding women – precautionary (limited safety data)
- Young children – developing bodies, long-term effects unknown
- People with kidney disease – potassium content concern
- Those with thyroid conditions – animal studies showed thyroid effects
- Anyone uncomfortable with limited testing
⚠️ Use Moderation:
- Occasional consumption likely safe for healthy adults
- Don't rely on it as primary sweetener – rotate if using artificial sweeteners
The Bottom Line
- ✅ Approved worldwide – regulators consider it safe
- ⚠️ Limited safety testing – far fewer studies than aspartame
- ⚠️ Industry-funded studies – potential bias
- ⚠️ Possible cancer risk – weak evidence from old animal studies
- ⚠️ Thyroid concerns in animal studies
- ⚠️ Gut bacteria effects – emerging research
- ⚠️ No long-term human studies
- ✅ Heat stable and cheap – widely used in diet drinks
Our recommendation: Acesulfame K is probably safe in moderation, but the limited and outdated safety testing is concerning. If using artificial sweeteners, consider better-studied alternatives like stevia (natural) or aspartame (100+ studies). Pregnant women and children should avoid until better long-term safety data available.
🔍 Track E950 with NutraSafe
Scan barcodes to identify Acesulfame K and all artificial sweeteners in your food.
Try NutraSafe Now
Last updated: February 2026