E-numbers / Preservatives / E216
also: Propyl para-hydroxybenzoate · Propyl paraben · Propyl p-hydroxybenzoate
A synthetic preservative from the paraben family, once used to stop mould and bacteria in baked goods. Banned in the UK and EU since 2006 over unresolved reproductive harm.
Scan a barcode to check a food for propylparaben. NutraSafe Pro · £6.99/month · iOS
Animal studies found reduced sperm production and falling testosterone at doses within the old acceptable daily intake.
1
of the 43,325 UK supermarket foods we checked declare E216 in their ingredients
That is under 0.1%, counted by its code or its name.
Counted by NutraSafe from UK supermarket ingredient lists, September 2026. How we counted
Why it’s worth knowing. Animal studies found reduced sperm production and falling testosterone at doses within the old acceptable daily intake. Parabens also weakly mimic oestrogen. Regulators could not find a level at which propylparaben caused no reproductive harm, so no safe intake could be set.
Propylparaben is the propyl ester of p-hydroxybenzoic acid, a synthetic chemical from the paraben family. It is a white powder, odourless and slightly soluble in water. Parabens occur naturally in small amounts in some plants, but propylparaben used industrially is made by reacting p-hydroxybenzoic acid with propanol.
It works by disrupting the cell membranes of bacteria, moulds and yeasts, preventing them from growing and extending shelf life. It is effective at low concentrations and across a wide pH range. Historically it was often used alongside methyl- or ethylparaben for broader microbial cover.
Before the EU ban it appeared in cakes, pie crusts, pastries, icings and toppings, savoury jelly coatings on meat and fish products, meat and fish pastes, marinades, flavoured syrups, confectionery fillings, and soft drinks. It is still permitted in pharmaceuticals and cosmetics in many countries. On a UK food label it would have appeared as E216 or propyl p-hydroxybenzoate.
A 2002 study fed propylparaben to young male rats for four weeks and found that daily sperm production fell significantly at every dose tested, including the lowest dose, which matched the upper limit of the old acceptable daily intake. Testosterone also dropped in a dose-dependent manner. Because no dose was found that caused no harm, it was impossible to set a safe intake level. This finding was the primary reason EFSA withdrew authorisation for the additive.
Daily sperm production and sperm reserves fell in a dose-dependent manner in young male rats given propylparaben; all treatment groups showed significant reductions in daily sperm production, leaving no identifiable no-effect level.
EFSA concluded it could not set an acceptable daily intake for propylparaben because no clear no-observed-adverse-effect-level existed for the reproductive endpoint in juvenile rats.
The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) withdrew propylparaben from the paraben group acceptable daily intake following review of the same reproductive toxicity data.
Parabens bind to oestrogen receptors and produce oestrogen-like effects in laboratory and some animal tests, though the potency is far lower than natural oestrogens. The longer the alkyl chain, the stronger the oestrogen-like activity, placing propylparaben between methyl- and butylparaben in potency. A 2021 European scientific committee reviewed this evidence and concluded the available data showed indications of potential endocrine effects, but was insufficient to formally confirm propylparaben as an endocrine disruptor in humans.
Propylparaben shows oestrogenic activity in vitro and in uterotrophic assays; oestrogenicity increases with alkyl chain length across the paraben series.
A 2021 EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety opinion concluded there was insufficient data to conclusively confirm propylparaben as an endocrine-disrupting substance, while acknowledging the potential for endocrine effects remains.
Parabens including propylparaben have been detected intact in human breast tumour tissue. The 2004 study that first reported this used 20 samples with no comparison group of healthy tissue, so it could not show whether paraben levels differ between cancerous and non-cancerous breast, and could not distinguish food exposure from cosmetic or pharmaceutical sources. Subsequent larger studies confirmed parabens accumulate in breast tissue but causality has not been established.
Parabens including propylparaben were found intact in 20 human breast tumour samples; mean total paraben concentration was 20.6 nanograms per gram of tissue. The study had no healthy tissue control group and could not determine the source of exposure.
Observational cohort studies have measured propylparaben in pregnant women's urine and followed their children's cognitive and behavioural development. One prospective cohort study found associations between higher prenatal propylparaben exposure in the second and third trimesters and lower cognitive development scores at age 3 in female children. The cohort was enriched for autism risk, the sample was small (130 children), and results are inconsistent across cohorts. Confounding from other chemical exposures cannot be ruled out. No causal link has been established.
In a prospective cohort enriched for autism risk, higher prenatal propylparaben exposure in the second and third trimesters was associated with lower standardised developmental scores at age 3 in female children (approximately 2.57 units lower at the 75th vs 25th percentile of exposure); the sample included 130 children.
Propylparaben is banned in UK and EU food, so it should not appear on a UK food label as an E number. It remains present in some cosmetics and medicines sold in the UK, where it appears as propylparaben or propyl p-hydroxybenzoate in the ingredients list. Those who want to minimise paraben exposure from all product types, including people who are pregnant or trying to conceive, may wish to check ingredient lists of personal care products and medicines for those terms.
The EU and JECFA withdrew propylparaben from food use because the same animal study that raised the alarm showed harm at the dose that used to be the acceptable daily intake, leaving regulators with nowhere to go: there was no lower dose on record that showed no harm. That is a specific and unusual situation. The breast tissue detection studies are regularly cited in media coverage but carry less regulatory weight than the reproductive toxicity data because they could not separate food exposure from cosmetic exposure and had no healthy tissue for comparison. Other regulatory bodies, including Health Canada in 2019, have questioned the weight of the rat study evidence and permit restricted food uses. Later high-quality rat studies found no reproductive harm at much higher doses, casting doubt on the original Oishi data. The science here is genuinely contested between regulatory bodies, and the EU/UK position is the more precautionary one.
Yes. E216 (propylparaben) is not permitted as a food additive in the UK or EU. It was removed from EU food additive authorisations by Directive 2006/52/EC following EFSA's 2004 conclusion that no safe intake level could be established. The UK maintains the same position. It should not appear as an ingredient in any food sold in the UK.
Animal studies showed propylparaben reduced sperm production and testosterone in young male rats at the lowest dose tested, which happened to match the upper limit of what was then the acceptable daily intake. Because no dose was found that caused no harm, EFSA concluded it was impossible to set a safe intake level and recommended withdrawal. JECFA reached the same conclusion independently in 2006.
E216 is banned in UK and EU food and should not be present in products sold here. Before the ban it was used in cakes, pastries, icings, meat and fish pastes, jelly coatings on chilled meat and fish products, marinades, flavoured syrups, and some confectionery. It may still appear in imported foods from countries where it is permitted, such as the United States, and in medicines and cosmetics.
Propylparaben is synthetically manufactured and contains no animal-derived ingredients, so it is technically vegan. It is produced by reacting p-hydroxybenzoic acid with propanol.
Last reviewed: 20 June 2026
It's the only app that does thisUKJaneK
You Need This AppGmac2005
Best AppGK getting skinny UK App Store reviews
NutraSafe reads the label and puts every additive into plain English, with the source, right in the app.
NutraSafe Pro · £6.99/month · iOS
