What is it?
Biphenyl (also called diphenyl) is a white crystalline aromatic compound made of two benzene rings joined together. It is synthesised from benzene and was used as an antifungal preservative applied to the surface of citrus fruits.
E-numbers / Preservatives / E230
also: Diphenyl · 1,1'-biphenyl · Phenylbenzene
A synthetic antifungal once applied to citrus peel during storage. No longer a permitted food additive in the UK or EU.
Scan a barcode to check a food for biphenyl. NutraSafe Pro · £6.99/month · iOS
Animal studies link biphenyl to kidney damage and bladder tumours in male rats at high doses.
Why it’s worth knowing. Animal studies link biphenyl to kidney damage and bladder tumours in male rats at high doses. The US EPA sets a low reference dose based on dose-related kidney injury in long-term animal studies.
Biphenyl (also called diphenyl) is a white crystalline aromatic compound made of two benzene rings joined together. It is synthesised from benzene and was used as an antifungal preservative applied to the surface of citrus fruits.
Biphenyl inhibits the growth of Penicillium mould and other fungi on the outer peel of citrus fruit during long-distance transport and cold storage. It was applied as a liquid dip or incorporated into wax coatings on the fruit surface.
Historically used on the peel of oranges, lemons, grapefruits, mandarins, and limes. It is no longer permitted as a food additive in the UK or EU. Citrus fruit sold in those markets cannot legally carry it. On a label it would have appeared as 'E230', 'biphenyl', or 'diphenyl' in a 'surface treatment' declaration.
Long-term feeding studies in rats produced consistent, dose-related damage to the kidneys, including mineralisation of the renal medulla, desquamation of the renal pelvis, and elevated blood urea nitrogen indicating impaired kidney function. These effects were observed across multiple studies and in both sexes. The US EPA used kidney damage in rats as the basis for setting a reference dose for biphenyl exposure.
Two-year dietary exposure in F344 rats produced dose-related kidney changes including mineralisation, pelvis hyperplasia, papillary necrosis, and elevated blood urea nitrogen at all but the lowest doses.
The US EPA set an oral reference dose of 0.05 mg/kg body weight per day for biphenyl, based on kidney injury observed in chronic animal feeding studies.
Male rats fed the highest test dose (4,500 ppm) for two years developed bladder tumours at a substantially elevated rate, including both papillomas and carcinomas. No bladder tumours were seen in female rats or in males at lower doses, suggesting the effect was dose-dependent and sex-specific. The US EPA concluded there is 'suggestive evidence of carcinogenic potential' based on these animal findings. No human studies have directly examined biphenyl food exposure and cancer risk.
In a 105-week rat study, significantly increased bladder carcinoma (24/50) and papilloma (10/50) were found only in male rats at 4,500 ppm. No bladder tumours occurred at lower doses or in females.
The US EPA concluded that biphenyl provides 'suggestive evidence of carcinogenic potential' in animals based on bladder tumours in male rats and liver tumours in female mice. No human carcinogenicity data were available.
Female mice in long-term dietary studies showed increased liver tumour rates. Biphenyl and some of its metabolites have shown some ability to induce genetic damage in laboratory tests, though whether this is the driver of observed tumours in animals remains unclear. The role of genotoxicity in any human risk from food exposure has not been established.
Increased liver tumours in female BDF1 mice were observed in a long-term dietary exposure study, contributing to the US EPA's carcinogenicity classification.
Biphenyl and its metabolites have shown some capacity to induce genetic damage in laboratory studies, though the mechanistic role in the observed animal tumours is not resolved.
Workers with heavy occupational exposure to large quantities of biphenyl have reported liver damage and effects on the central and peripheral nervous system. These were high-dose industrial settings, not food-additive use levels, and the relevance to consumer dietary exposure from treated fruit peel is uncertain.
Occupational exposure to high amounts of biphenyl has been associated with reports of liver damage and central and peripheral nerve effects in workers.
Because E230 is not a permitted food additive in the UK or EU, it should not appear in food sold in these markets. Anyone who handles large quantities of biphenyl industrially should follow occupational exposure controls. On any food that legally carries a 'surface treatment' declaration for citrus, check whether the specific preservative listed is E230, E231, or E232, as E231 and E232 remain subject to their own regulatory frameworks.
Biphenyl is no longer a live consumer food additive in the UK or EU, having been removed from the permitted list in 2003. The animal evidence that informed its removal is real: kidney damage at multiple doses and bladder tumours in male rats at the highest test dose. What these findings mean for humans at the lower exposures that would have come from treated citrus peel is genuinely uncertain. The US EPA characterises the cancer evidence as 'suggestive' rather than established. No human studies have directly examined dietary biphenyl exposure and cancer or kidney outcomes. The science is sparse partly because the additive is no longer in use.
Biphenyl is not a permitted food additive in the UK. It was removed from the EU food additives framework in 2003 and is not on the UK FSA approved-additives register. Citrus fruit sold in UK supermarkets cannot legally be treated with it as a food additive.
The EU reclassified biphenyl as a plant protection product rather than a food additive in 2003, withdrawing authorisations by 2004. Animal studies had shown dose-related kidney damage at multiple doses and bladder tumours in male rats at the highest tested dose. The US EPA classifies it as having 'suggestive evidence of carcinogenic potential' based on animal data.
Biphenyl was historically applied to the outer peel of citrus fruits including oranges, lemons, grapefruits, and mandarins to prevent mould during storage. It is no longer a permitted food additive in the UK or EU, so food sold in those markets should not carry it.
Biphenyl is a synthetic aromatic hydrocarbon and does not derive from animal products, so it would be considered vegan. However, as it is not a permitted food additive in the UK or EU, the question is largely academic for food sold in these markets.
Last reviewed: 20 June 2026
It's the only app that does thisUKJaneK
You Need This AppGmac2005
Best AppGK getting skinny UK App Store reviews
NutraSafe reads the label and puts every additive into plain English, with the source, right in the app.
NutraSafe Pro · £6.99/month · iOS