E-numbers / E160d Colour

Lycopene

also: Lycopene from tomato · Lycopene from Blakeslea trispora · Synthetic lycopene · Natural Yellow 27
plantVegan ✓Vegetarian ✓Halal ✓Kosher ✓
The short version

A natural red pigment found in tomatoes and watermelon, used to give foods a pink or red colour.

What is it?

Lycopene is a carotenoid pigment responsible for the red and pink colour in tomatoes, watermelon, pink grapefruit, papaya, and guava. As a food additive it can come from three sources: extracted from tomatoes (the most common), produced synthetically, or derived from a fermentation process using the fungus Blakeslea trispora. It is fat-soluble and belongs to the same chemical family as beta-carotene, but unlike beta-carotene it does not convert to vitamin A in the body.

What does it do?

Lycopene absorbs light in the blue-green part of the visible spectrum, giving foods a pink-to-red hue. Because it is fat-soluble, it blends into oily or fatty food matrices more readily than water-based ones. Bioavailability is higher from cooked or processed tomato products than from raw tomatoes, because heat converts the straight-chain (trans) form into bent (cis) forms that are more readily absorbed alongside dietary fat.

Where you will see it

Used to colour processed meat products (such as vegetarian sausages), flavoured dairy products, soups, sauces, bakery icings and decorations, edible ices, confectionery, non-alcoholic flavoured drinks, and certain seafood preparations. On a UK label it appears as 'colour: lycopene', 'colour: E160d', or simply 'lycopene' in the ingredients list.

What the science says

EFSA established an ADI and flagged that young children can exceed it

EFSA set an acceptable daily intake of 0.5mg per kilogram of body weight per day, derived from a one-year rat study in which higher doses caused raised liver enzyme levels (ALT and AST). EFSA considered those liver-enzyme changes toxicologically significant; JECFA, reviewing the same study, did not, and assigned lycopene an ADI of 'not specified'. Neither agency identified harm to humans at dietary levels. Separately, EFSA's exposure modelling has consistently found that toddlers and pre-school children are the groups most likely to reach or exceed the ADI when lycopene is present at its maximum permitted level across multiple food categories simultaneously. A 2026 EFSA dietary exposure assessment reconfirmed this, with toddlers reaching up to 2.52mg/kg body weight per day at the 95th percentile in the regulatory maximum level scenario, around five times the ADI, though naturally occurring lycopene from food dominated that estimate rather than the additive alone.

EFSA derived an ADI of 0.5mg/kg body weight/day for lycopene from all sources, based on a NOAEL of 50mg/kg/day from a one-year rat study showing raised liver enzyme levels; the effect was partly reversible.

EFSA AFC Panel, Scientific Opinion on lycopene as a food colour, EFSA Journal2008regulatory

EFSA found that pre-school and school children were the groups most likely to exceed the ADI when lycopene from all permitted uses was combined, with high-level toddler exposure reaching 2.8 times the ADI in worst-case modelling.

EFSA AFC Panel, EFSA Journal, pub/6742008regulatory review

JECFA assigned lycopene an ADI of 'not specified', considering the elevated liver enzymes seen in the same rat study not to be adverse, because there were no accompanying signs of liver damage such as increased organ weight or histopathological changes.

JECFA 71st meeting2009regulatory

EFSA reaffirmed its 0.5mg/kg ADI after reviewing the divergence with JECFA, concluding the disagreement reflected different interpretations of the toxicological significance of the rat liver enzyme findings, not new data.

EFSA, Statement on the divergence between EFSA and JECFA risk assessment of lycopene, EFSA Journal2010regulatory review

A 2026 EFSA dietary exposure assessment found that in the regulatory maximum level scenario, toddlers reached a mean of 1.2mg/kg bw/day and a 95th percentile of 2.52mg/kg bw/day, both exceeding the ADI; naturally occurring lycopene was the main contributor in the more realistic refined scenario.

EFSA, Dietary exposure to lycopene from background diet, novel foods and food additive use in the European population, EFSA Journal 24(4):e99942026regulatory review

Prostate cancer: observational associations, not established cause

A sizeable body of observational research has found that men with higher dietary intake or higher blood levels of lycopene tend to have a lower rate of prostate cancer diagnosis. A 2015 meta-analysis of 26 studies covering over 563,000 participants found a statistically significant association between higher circulating lycopene and reduced prostate cancer risk. However, the evidence comes almost entirely from observational studies, and the few intervention trials that have tested lycopene supplementation directly have largely not demonstrated a protective effect. No regulatory body currently recommends lycopene supplementation to prevent prostate cancer.

A meta-analysis of 26 observational studies (563,299 participants, 17,517 prostate cancer cases) found higher lycopene consumption and circulating concentration were associated with lower prostate cancer risk; a linear dose-response was observed between intakes of approximately 9-21mg/day.

Guo et al., Lycopene and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Medicine (Baltimore), PMC46164442015meta-analysis

A dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies estimated prostate cancer risk was reduced by approximately 3% per 1mg/day increment of dietary lycopene intake, with relative risk of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.75-0.98) for dietary intake and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.69-0.96) for blood lycopene levels.

Rowles et al., Increased dietary and circulating lycopene are associated with reduced prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases2017meta-analysis

Most intervention trials testing lycopene supplementation have not demonstrated a cancer-preventive effect, in contrast to the positive signals from observational data, suggesting confounding may partly explain the epidemiological associations.

Saini et al., The Anti-Cancer Activity of Lycopene, PMC97410662022observational

Cardiovascular effects: mechanistic and observational evidence, mixed trial data

Laboratory and animal studies show lycopene has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that could in principle protect blood vessels. Epidemiological studies associate higher lycopene intake with lower rates of cardiovascular disease and ischaemic stroke. One randomised controlled trial found that lycopene supplementation improved endothelial function in patients with existing cardiovascular disease. However, 11 out of 43 studies reviewed in a 2022 analysis found no reduction in cardiovascular risk factors, and most human evidence remains observational, making it difficult to separate lycopene's effect from that of a generally tomato-rich diet.

A randomised controlled trial found endothelium-dependent vasodilatation improved by 53% in cardiovascular disease patients taking lycopene supplementation compared to placebo.

Gajendragadkar et al., Effects of Oral Lycopene Supplementation on Vascular Function, PLOS One, PMC40496042014RCT

A 2022 narrative review of 43 studies found evidence supporting lycopene's role in reducing oxidative stress, inflammation, and atherosclerosis, but 11 of those studies found no reduction in cardiovascular risk factors; the authors noted that most human evidence remained observational.

Mozos et al., Lycopene in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases, PMC88800802022observational

Where it stands with the regulators

Status
Approved for use in the UK and EU as a food colour
Legal basis
UK FSA approved-additives list and assimilated EU Regulation 1333/2008 (Annex II), as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1129/2011
Permitted foods
Non-alcoholic flavoured drinks; Confectionery; Sauces and condiments; Soups; Edible ices and ice cream; Flavoured fermented milk products; Fine bakery wares (decorations, coatings, fillings); Jams, jellies and marmalades; Processed fish and seafood preparations; Certain meat preparations and meat products; Edible cheese rinds; Dietary food supplements; Meal replacements for weight control
Maximum levels
Ranges from 5mg/kg (soups) to 500mg/kg depending on food category; 15mg/day in food supplements; 8mg/meal in total diet replacements
Safe-intake limit (ADI)
0.5mg/kg body weight per day (EFSA, 2008). JECFA assigned 'not specified' (no numerical limit) in 2009, reflecting a divergent interpretation of the same underlying study.
History
Lycopene from tomato extract has been used as a food colour for many years. In 2005, EFSA first assessed lycopene from Blakeslea trispora and found the data insufficient to set an ADI. In 2008, EFSA set an ADI of 0.5mg/kg bw/day covering all three sources (tomato-derived, synthetic, and B. trispora-derived), noting that the ADI could be exceeded by young children consuming multiple lycopene-coloured products. JECFA's 2009 assessment of the same data produced an ADI of 'not specified', creating a divergence EFSA addressed in a 2010 statement, maintaining its own stricter position. In 2015, EFSA post-marketing monitoring confirmed no need to change the ADI based on updated sales and consumption data. In 2017, EFSA concluded that extending permitted uses to certain meat preparations would not add significantly to overall intake at current maximum levels, but noted that maximum-level scenario exposures still exceeded the ADI in toddlers and children. In 2023, EFSA concluded that safe use of a yellow/orange tomato extract novel food could not be established, in part because combined lycopene exposure risked exceeding the ADI; EFSA subsequently produced a full dietary exposure assessment in 2026, which confirmed the ADI is exceeded in toddlers and children at the 95th percentile in the regulatory maximum level scenario, with naturally occurring lycopene the main contributor.

Who should be careful

No specific group must avoid lycopene-coloured foods; it is not a known allergen and is not contraindicated in pregnancy or infancy. Parents of young children who eat a diet already rich in tomato-based products (pasta sauces, soups, ketchup) alongside other lycopene-coloured products may wish to note that combined intakes in that age group can, at the upper end, exceed the level EFSA considers acceptable. Look for 'colour: lycopene', 'colour: E160d', or 'lycopene' in the ingredients list.

The honest read

Cutting through the noise

Lycopene is one of the most studied carotenoids and is a normal constituent of a tomato-containing diet. As an additive, it has a well-established regulatory history in the UK and EU. The main unresolved question is the liver-enzyme finding in rats: EFSA considers it meaningful enough to set a numerical ADI, while JECFA does not, leading to two different international conclusions from the same data. The practical consequence is that EFSA's exposure modelling consistently shows toddlers and young children can exceed EFSA's ADI when multiple lycopene-coloured products are combined, though this reflects the stricter of two legitimate expert interpretations, and naturally occurring lycopene from food contributes more to that total than the additive itself. On the potential health benefits, the observational evidence linking dietary lycopene to lower prostate cancer risk and cardiovascular protection is consistent and substantial, but intervention trials have not clearly confirmed a causal effect. The science here is live and continues to be updated, most recently by EFSA's 2026 dietary exposure assessment.

Related additives

Common questions

Is E160d banned in the UK?

No. E160d lycopene is approved for use as a food colour in the UK under the assimilated EU Regulation 1333/2008, and it appears on the UK FSA's approved-additives list.

Can young children eat a lot of lycopene-coloured foods?

EFSA has flagged that toddlers and pre-school children are the age group most likely to exceed the acceptable daily intake it set for lycopene when multiple lycopene-coloured products are consumed alongside a tomato-rich diet. This concern is specific to cumulative intake across many products, not to any single food. JECFA, using the same underlying data, did not set a numerical limit at all, so there is genuine scientific disagreement about where the threshold lies.

What foods contain E160d?

Lycopene (E160d) is permitted in non-alcoholic flavoured drinks, flavoured dairy products, soups, sauces, confectionery, bakery coatings and fillings, edible ices, certain meat preparations, and food supplements. It appears on labels as 'colour: lycopene', 'colour: E160d', or 'lycopene' in the ingredients list.

Is E160d vegan?

It depends on the source. Tomato-derived lycopene (E160d ii) is vegan. Lycopene from the fungus Blakeslea trispora (E160d iii) is vegan. Synthetic lycopene (E160d i) is also vegan. None of the three authorised sources involves animal products. However, UK labels are not required to state which source was used, so you cannot determine this from the label alone.

Sources

Last reviewed: 20 June 2026

See this on every food you scan

NutraSafe reads the label and puts every additive into plain English, with the source, right in the app.

Get NutraSafe on the App Store
NutraSafe Pro · £3.99/month · iOS